Both cameras have excellent autofocus systems and image processing capabilities.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras can film in 422 10-bit, but the a6700 has superior video specs:
4K 60 FPS without crop and 4K 120 FPS in crop mode.
a7c Mark II can only do 4K 60 FPS with a crop.
The a7c Mark II has better in-body image stabilization (IBIS).
Low Light Performance
Full-frame generally performs better in low light, but the a6700 has improved significantly.
Both cameras have good noise control at high ISO levels.
Photography Performance
Both cameras excel in photography, with similar image quality.
The a6700 has a slight edge in burst shooting speed (11 FPS vs. 10 FPS).
Lens Options and Cost
APS-C lenses for the a6700 are smaller, lighter, and cheaper.
Cost comparison shows significant savings when choosing the a6700 with equivalent lenses.
Personal Preference and Recommendations
The reviewer prefers the a6700 for everyday use and travel.
Suggests waiting for the potential release of the Sony a75 for those interested in full-frame.
✨ Key Takeaways
The Sony a6700is recommended for hybrid shooters looking for a compact, cost-effective camera with excellent video capabilities and good low-light performance.
The Sony a7c Mark IIis a solid full-frame option but may not justify its higher price given the advantages of the a6700.
Customizability, weight, and lens options are crucial factors in choosing between the two systems.
🧠 Lessons
When choosing between full-frame and APS-C, consider your specific needs (e.g., travel, video, low light).
Evaluate the importance of custom controls and ergonomics based on your shooting style.
Always factor in the total cost of ownership, including lenses and accessories, when making a camera purchase decision.